A couple of memorization techniques of mine.

Started by Angstromicus
248045ee54778957c5d2fb5eeffe9ac7?s=128&d=mm

Angstromicus

I'm new here and am just starting, but I've been doing a little experimentation on memorizing verses.

When I study each verse, I make sure to keep the context in mind. I chain the existing verse to the previous and next verses, and keep in context the setting and plot of the scripture given by the related verses. For example, I make sure to know or study how John 1:3 relates to John 1:2 and John 1:4 and John 1:1 - John 1:5.

To help with this, I make sure to periodically study verses sequentially, and in reverse (i.e. John 1:5, John 1:4, John 1:3, etc.), using the context techniques above.

I also periodically study verses in random order (using http://www.random.org 's integer sets for the random list of unique numbers). If I can quickly recall exactly what John 1:5 is without having to call upon the context, then it's a fast recall. If I need to think of the context to figure out what John 1:5 is, it's a slow recall. If I can do a quick random recall, I make sure to recall the context as well. If I didn't I might have a case like this: I can recall John 3:16, but not John 3:14, not John 3:17, and neither the context in which it was spoken, so my memory has holes in it that would not be there if I had practiced the context.

I'd really like to see these techniques and others supported as features on memverse, but I don't see a suggestions page.

E722bfd45297b0c0558ed8ed53593094?s=128&d=mm

Alex Watt

Sorry for the delay. I was just looking at the forum and noticed we hadn't approved this post yet.

Just so you know, the little Feedback tab on the right of each page allows you to ask questions, report problems, make suggestions, and share praise for Memverse. We get emails with each topic and comments so it helps us to stay on top of things.

We're working on improving how sequential verses are handled on Memverse. Thanks for sharing your thoughts.

248045ee54778957c5d2fb5eeffe9ac7?s=128&d=mm

Angstromicus

Ah, thanks! My eyes glanced over that (over and over and over :( ). Was looking at the header and footer and body of the page without looking at the side borders :(. I suppose that's one drawback either to a 2560 x 1600 monitor :P or to my habit of subconsciously chunking out sensory data I shouldn't (peripheral vision should have caught it).

Trans